Keep Accreditation About Academics Act

Accrediting agencies are increasingly calling for colleges and universities to incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) initiatives into their programs. In their effort to become or remain accredited, colleges and universities have deployed various DEI initiatives, such as “racial bias” trainings, that often push school employees and students to treat people differently, or assign blame to people, based on the color of their skin or other characteristics. Accrediting agencies should be focused on academics, not enforcing their views on DEI.

Summary: AN ACT relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion in accreditation of public institutions of higher education.

SECTION 1. Legislative Findings.

NOTE – legislative findings are set forth in the Selecting Neutral Accreditors Act

SECTION 2. Definitions.

  1. “Accreditation” means the status of public recognition that an accrediting agency grants to an educational institution, program, or both that meets the agency’s standards and requirements.
  2. “Accrediting agency” means a person or governmental entity that conducts accrediting activities and makes decisions concerning the accreditation or pre-accreditation status of institutions, programs, or both. It includes any national, regional, or programmatic accrediting agency.
  3. “Diversity, equity, and inclusion” means any differential treatment of, or assignment of any fault or blame to, an individual or group at an institution of higher education based on race, color, ethnicity, national origin (other than as it relates to immigration status under United States law), sex (other than related to sex-segregated facilities, such as dormitories and bathrooms, or athletic programs), sexual orientation, or gender identity.
  4. “Diversity, equity, and inclusion practice or procedure” means any initiative, policy, program, mandate, requirement, standard, metric, statistic, or other practice or procedure related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
  5. “Institution of higher education” means a public postsecondary educational institution in this state, including all of the institution’s programs, departments, divisions, offices, centers, colleges, and schools and any person acting on behalf of any of the foregoing.

SECTION 3. Prohibition.

  1. When taking any action on the accreditation or renewal of accreditation of an institution of higher education, an accrediting agency shall not:
    1. base its accrediting decision in any way on a review or consideration of any diversity, equity, and inclusion practice or procedure,
    2. collect information related to any diversity, equity, and inclusion practice or procedure, or
    3. include any requirement related to any diversity, equity, and inclusion practice or procedure.
  2. Pursuant to subsection (A), an accrediting agency considering the accreditation or renewal of accreditation of an institution of higher education must implement policies to ensure that any person with any decision-making or recommendation authority related to that accreditation or renewal of accreditation does not collect and is not presented with any information regarding any diversity, equity, and inclusion practice or procedure.

SECTION 4. Enforcement.

  1. Section 3 of this Act may be enforced through a civil action brought against an accrediting agency by any person who was or is a student of an institution of higher education, or was or is employed by an institution of higher education.
  2. Section 3 of this Act also may be enforced against an accrediting agency by the attorney general. Any violation of Section 3 of this Act shall constitute a violation of [state civil rights law], and the attorney general may investigate and seek remedies as provided in that law. Any violation of Section 3 of this Act also shall constitute an unfair act in violation of [state UDAP statute], and the attorney general may investigate and seek remedies as provided in that law.
  3. In addition to any other remedies available at law or equity, an accrediting agency that violates Section 3 of this Act shall be obligated to pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of the party bringing the lawsuit and to pay damages to the party bringing the lawsuit in an amount equal to three times all monies paid to the accrediting agency by the institution of higher education for the accrediting agency’s services, whether dues, fees, or otherwise.
  4. In addition to any other remedies available at law or equity, an accrediting agency that violates Section 3 of this Act shall be liable to pay civil penalties to the party bringing the lawsuit in an amount up to $1,000 per student that attended the institution of higher education at the time the accrediting agency violated Section 3 of this Act.

SECTION 5. Severability.

SECTION 6. Applicability and Effective Date.